Market Monitor Construction Germany 2019

Market Monitor

  • Germany
  • Construction

21st February 2019

Many smaller construction companies have weak equity ratios and limited financial scope, which makes them vulnerable to payment delays and defaults.

  • Benign order situation in 2019
  • Poor payment behaviour of public buyers remains an issue
  • Interior work-related segments show higher vulnerability

 

2019 mm cons ger pic1

 

In 2018 the German construction sector continued to perform solidly and the outlook for 2019 remains positive, mainly driven by a robust order situation in the residential construction segment, but also in public construction.

While market competition has decreased somewhat (until recently many companies had to specialise and to operate in niches in order to survive), it remains high. Due to the benign demand situation and robust price increases most construction businesses were able to improve their profits over the past few years, and the profit outlook for 2019 remains stable.

The dependence of German construction businesses on bank finance is not overly high, given that payments in advance or instalment payments by investors are a major source of financing.

 

2019 mm cons ger pic2

 

On average, payments in the German construction sector take around 45-60 days. With demand increasing and profit margins having improved, payment delays and insolvencies have decreased in recent years, and are expected to remain stable in 2019.

However, despite the more benign situation we still consider the construction sector to be riskier than other industries, as the proportion of non-payment notifications and credit insurance claims is still higher than in other German trade sectors.

The poor payment behaviour of public buyers remains an issue, as it puts a strain on suppliers’ liquidity. Many construction companies – especially smaller ones – traditionally have weak equity ratios (the proportion of equity used to finance a company's assets) and limited financial scope, which makes them vulnerable to payment delays and defaults.

 

2019 mm cons ger pic3

 

We still observe higher claims in some segments related to interior and finishing work, such as building installation, plastering, painting and glazing. Those activities are usually due at the final stage of building projects, and are therefore more susceptible to budget constraints of the awarding authority. Another reason could be the lack of commercial skills in those mainly very small businesses.

Due to the good performance of the German construction and construction materials sector in the last couple of years and the promising business outlook for 2019, our underwriting stance for the industry remains quite relaxed. In general, when assessing buyer risk we take into account operating results, equity, liquidity and financing (e.g. the ratio of work in progress/advanced payments) and orders in hand.

 

2019 mm cons ger pic4

 

However, we are more cautious with the above-mentioned interior work-related segments and businesses that are mainly active for public customers (road, railway and other infrastructure construction). Those often face delayed payments by their clients, which could put a strain on their liquidity.

With less background information to work with, we are naturally very cautious when assessing the creditworthiness of construction/construction materials businesses that have operated for less than one year, unless they are part of, or a spin off from, a larger group.

 

Related documents

Disclaimer

Each publication available on or from our websites, such as, but not limited to webpages, reports, articles, publications, tips and helpful content, trading briefs, infographics, videos (each a “Publication”) is provided for information purposes only and is not intended as a recommendation or advice as to particular transactions, investments or strategies in any way to any reader. Readers must make their own independent decisions, commercial or otherwise, regarding the information provided. While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in any Publication has been obtained from reliable sources, Atradius is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in any Publication is provided ’as is’, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from its use, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied. In no event will Atradius, its related partnerships or corporations, or the partners, agents or employees thereof, be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in any Publication, or for any loss of opportunity, loss of profit, loss of production, loss of business or indirect losses, special or similar damages of any kind, even if advised of the possibility of such losses or damages.